2024, 69, No. 2
University of Warsaw, Faculty of Pedagogy, Doctoral School of Social Sciences
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 212 KB
Number of views:132
Number of downloads:56
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Bibliography
Banas, J. A., Rains, S. A. (2010). A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 281-311.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758193
Blakeslee, S. (2004). The CRAAP test. Loex Quarterly, 31(3), 4. Pobrane z https://commons.emich. edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=loexquarterly (otwarty 07.07.2024).
Bleakley, P. (2023). Panic, pizza and mainstreaming the alt-right: A social media analysis of Pizza¬gate and the rise of the QAnon conspiracy. Current Sociology, 71(3), 509-525.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211034896
Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., Blaum, D., Millis, K. (2019). A Reasoned Approach to Dealing With Fake News. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 94-101.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218814855
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inocu¬lation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0175799.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
D'Ancona, M. (2017). Post-truth: The new war on truth and how to fight back. Londyn: Ebury Press.
Domenico, G. D., Sit, J., Ishizaka, A., Nunan, D. (2021). Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 124, 329-341.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.037
Faix, A., Daniels, T. (2023). Teaching SIFT for Source Evaluation in Asynchronous One-Credit Infor-mation Literacy Courses. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 23(3), 449-459.
https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.a901563
Green, M., McShane, C. J., Swinbourne, A. (2022). Active versus passive: Evaluating the effective¬ness of inoculation techniques in relation to misinformation about climate change. Australian Journal of Psychology, 74(1), 2113340.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2022.2113340
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Nowy Jork: Macmillan.
Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., Hertwig, R. (2020). Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digi¬tal Challenges With Cognitive Tools. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3), 103-156.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620946707
Linden, S. van der (2022). Misinformation: Susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public. Nature Medicine, 28(3), 460-467.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6
Lowe, M. S., Macy, K. V., Murphy, E., Kani, J. (2021). Questioning CRAAP: A Comparison of Sour¬ce Evaluation Methods with First-Year Undergraduate Students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 21(3).
https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v21i3.30744
Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., Basol, M., van der Linden, S. (2021). Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(1), 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000315
Mandalios, J. (2013). RADAR: An approach for helping students evaluate Internet sources. Journal of Information Science, 39(4), 470-478.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551513478889
Marin, L. M., Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Expli¬cit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002
Maynes, J. (2015). Critical Thinking and Cognitive Bias. Informal Logic, 35(2).
https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v35i2.4187
McGrew, S. (2020). Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning. Computers & Education, 145, 103711.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711
McGuire, W. J. (1964). Some contemporary approaches. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, t. 1, 191-229.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60052-0
Moravec, P. L., Kim, A., Dennis, A. R. (2020). Appealing to Sense and Sensibility: System 1 and System 2 Interventions for Fake News on Social Media. Information Systems Research, 31(3), 987−1006.
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0927
Revez, J., Corujo, L. (2021). Librarians against fake news: A systematic literature review of library practices (Jan. 2018-Sept. 2020). The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(2), 102304.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102304
Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance aga¬inst online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5(1).
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9
Salovich, N. A., Rapp, D. N. (2021). Misinformed and unaware? Metacognition and the influence of inaccurate information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(4), 608-624.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000977
Thompson, D. (2021). Using the DIG Method for Data Literacy. https://digitalcommons.murraystate. edu/faculty/73/
Other articles from the issue
Spis treści / Content
- new media in educationcontemporary media educationmedia languagethe internet and the Deafcommunication competencies of students with ASDwebwritingcritical thinkingrhetorical criticism
Wprowadzenie
Joanna Madalińska-Michalak, Magdalena Trysińska
- linguistic taboosdetabooisationdevulgarisationdesensitizationmedia languageanalysis of linguistic messages
Czy przełamywanie tabu językowego służy czy szkodzi komunikacji społecznej? Problematyka detabuizacji, dewulgaryzacji i desensytyzacji języka mediów w świetle wypowiedzi studentów dziennikarstwa
Aleksandra Karolina Pethe
