When foreigners join the class. Changes in the university classroom environment – a “cost-benefit” analysis
2016, 61, Numer 3
University of Warsaw, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Policy and Social Research on Education
Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Pedagogiczny, Katedra Polityki Oświaty i Społecznych Badań nad Edukacją
DOI
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 101 KB
Liczba wyświetleń:126
Liczba pobrań:14
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
The aim of the paper is to examine how university classroom environment changes with the arrival of foreign students, especially those who are participants of international exchange programmes. The learning environment is an important component of higher education, as adult students are often conscious learners, who want to learn and see the purpose in doing so; also, they are often self-conscious, especially in a foreign language class. A multi-cultural classroom can be a beneficial element of university education, for both the students and the teacher, as it provides an opportunity for students to share experiences and bring their insights to the learning process. Conversely, one of the challenges a university teacher faces is to find a way to actively involve all the students in the class, taking into account their various backgrounds, different language skills and learning experiences, styles and preferences. The article is designed specifically to examine the effects of student mobility on the learning environment and the challenges, costs and benefits of education in a multicultural class. It also presents recommendations to make the adult learning environment an effective one, especially when it comes to education in a multicultural environment and learning in a foreign language.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Billington D. D. 1988. Ego Development and Adult Education. Doctoral Dissertation, The FieldingInstitute. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49 (7). (University Microfilms No. 88–16, 275).
Cercone K. 2008. Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design,AACE Journal, 16(2), pp. 137–59.
Chaib M. & Chaib J. 2010. Teacher Students’ Social Representations, [in:] M. Chaib, B. Danermark& S. Selander, Education, Professionalization and Social Representations: On the Transformationof Social Knowledge, Taylor & Francis, London.
Członkowska-Naumiuk M. 2012. Numbers, facts, results, [in:] M. Członkowska-Naumiuk& A. Samel (eds.), Erasmus in Poland, Poland in Erasmus, Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji, Warszawa.
Dalglish C. 2002. Promoting Effective Learning in a Multicultural Classroom, EDINEB June, Mexico.
De Ville P., Martou F. & Vandenberghe V. 1996. Cost-benefit Analysis and Regulatory Issues ofStudent Mobility in the EU, European Journal of Education, Vol. 31, No. 2.
Dornyei Z. 1998. Survey Article: Motivation in second and foreign language learning, LanguageTeaching, vol. 31, pp. 117–35.
Du Xiaoyan. 2009. The Affective Filter in Second Language Teaching, Asian Social Science, Vol. 5,No. 8, August, pp. 162–5.
Imel S. 1994. Guidelines for Working with Adult Learners. ERIC Digest, No. 154.
Knowles M. S. 1980. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy, PrenticeHall/Cambridge, Englewood Cliffs.
Krashen S. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Krashen S. D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications, Longman.
Lightbown P. M. & Spada N. 2006. How Languages are Learned, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press,Oxford.
Rogers J. 1989. Adults Learning, 3rd ed., Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Vella J. 2002. Learning to Listen, Learning to Teach. The Power of Dialogue in Educating Adults, Revised edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Verbik L. & Lasanowski V. 2007. International student mobility: Patterns and trends, Observatory ofBorderless Higher Education, London.
Yap K. B., Wong D., Wong J., & Turner B. 2011. The Influence of Classroom Environment andApproaches to Learning in Achieving Outcomes in Marketing Education, available on-line at:http://anzmac.info/conference/2011/Papers%20by%20Presenting%20Author/Yap,%20Kenneth%20Paper%20571.pdf (accessed 20 February 2014).
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
Podobne publikacje
26.06.2026
Nowośćdigital competencehigher educationteacher educationdigital transformationteacher educatorDigital technologies in teaching: insights from Vietnamese teacher educators through a European perspective
Joanna Madalińska-Michalak, Lan Nhi Truong Thi, Nguyen Tien Hoang
20.03.2017
Hannah ArendtHenry A. Girouxneoliberalismpublic sphereuniversitycritical thinkingZbuntowana filozofia – subwersyjnej pedagogice. Hannah Arendt i Henry A. Giroux
Paulina Sosnowska
11.11.2016
academic careeruniversityneoliberal approachconsumerism“Where do we go?” – the dilemmas, challenges and hopes for future career development at the university
Daria Hejwosz-Gromkowska
