Education Research Quarterly

2015, 60, No. 4

Piotr Skorupiński

Publication date

18.01.2016

Publishing model

hybrid

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Social sciences

Discipline

educational sciences

Language of publication

Polish

Downloads

PDF 151 KB

Article

Number of views:161

Number of downloads:69

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

According to the latest edition of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (AERA et al. 2014), validity is still the most fundamental construct in educational measurement. The new edition, like the previous versions of the Testing Standards, contains standards of professional practice in validation. These standards of validity will be presented in the fourth section of this article. The first three sections explore validity standards included in the Testing Standards published before the 2014 edition, in the period of the shift from the trinitarian doctrine validity to the unitarian view of validity. The closing remarks consider the issue of the role of consequences in the most recent validity recommendations.

Bibliography

AERA, APA, NCME. 1985. Standards for educational and psychological testing, AERA, Washington.

AERA, APA, NCME. 1999. Standards for educational and psychological testing, AERA, Washington.

AERA, APA, NCME. 2007. Standardy dla testów stosowanych w psychologii i pedagogice, tłum. E. Hornowska, GWP, Gdańsk [pierwodruk: AERA i in. 1999].

AERA, APA, NCME. 2014. Standards for educational and psychological testing, AERA, Washington.

AERA, NCMUE. 1955. Technical recommendations for achievement tests, NEA, Washington.

APA, AERA, NCMUE. 1954. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques, „Psychological Bulletin”, t. 51, nr 2 (suplement), s. 1–38 (201–238).

APA, AERA, NCME. 1966. Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals, APA, Washington.

APA, AERA, NCME. 1974. Standards for educational and psychological tests, APA, Washington.

Kane M.T. 2013. Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores, „Journal of Educational Measurement”, t. 50, nr 1, s. 1–73.

Madaus G.F. 2001. A Brief History of Attempts To Monitor Testing, „NBETPP Statements”, t. 2, nr 2, Chestnut Hill, MA, dostępny na: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED456145.pdf [otwarty 14 marca 2015].

Messick S. 1989. Validity, [w:] Educational measurement, red. R.L. Linn, New York, s. 13–103.

Messick S. 1998. Test validity: a matter of consequence, „Social Indicators Research”, t. 45, nr 1–3, s. 35–44.

Niemierko B. 2009. Diagnostyka edukacyjna. Podręcznik akademicki, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Polskie Towarzystwo Psychologiczne. 1985. Standardy dla testów stosowanych w psychologii i pedagogice, tłum. E. Hornowska, PTP, Warszawa [pierwodruk: APA i in. 1974].

Skorupiński P.M. 2013. Modele trafności pomiaru, [w:] Ścieżki rozwoju edukacyjnego młodzieży – szkoły pogimnazjalne. Trafność wskaźników edukacyjnej wartości dodanej dla szkół maturalnych, red. M. Karwowski, IFiS PAN, Warszawa, s. 13–25.