Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny

Czy paradoks niepełnosprawności rzeczywiście istnieje? Wybrane konteksty i wątki dyskusyjne

2016, 61, Numer 1

Zakład Socjopedagogiki Specjalnej, Instytut Pedagogiki, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

DOI

-

Data publikacji

15.07.2016

Model publikowania

hybrydowy

Dziedzina

Dziedzina nauk społecznych

Dyscyplina

pedagogika

Język publikacji

Polski

Pliki do pobrania

PDF 190 KB

Artykuł

Liczba wyświetleń:115

Liczba pobrań:34

Cytowania Crossref:0

Wynik Altmetric:0


Abstrakt

The paper discusses the phenomenon referred to as the disability paradox by analyzing the concept according to three main aspects: semantic inconsistency, relationships between objective and subjective indicators, differences in beliefs regarding quality of life determinants, the sense of happiness and other positive life experiences reported by outsiders and insiders. Within these three semantic areas, issues are addressed presenting grounds for the perceived contradiction between the two phenomena: disability and high quality of life. What is more, the paper introduces topics for discussion providing arguments for questioning premises supporting validity of the disability paradox.

Słowa kluczowe:

Bibliografia

Albrecht G.L., Devlieger P.J. 1999. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds, „Social Science and Medicine”, vol. 48, s. 977–988.

Andresen E.M., Fouts B.S., Romeis J.C., Brownson C.A. 1999. Performance of health related quality of life instruments in a spinal cord injured population, „Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation”, vol. 80, s. 877–884.

Barnes C., Mercer G. 2008. Niepełnosprawność, Wydawnictwo Sic!, Warszawa.

Bedyńska S., Rycielski P. 2010. Kim jestem? Przeciwdziałanie stereotypizacji i stygmatyzacji osób z ograniczeniami sprawności, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa.

Bishop M. 2005. Quality of life and psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and acquired disability. A conceptual and theoretical synthesis, „Journal of Rehabilitation”, vol. 71, s. 5–13.

Borg J., Larsson S., Ostergren P-O., Eide A.H. 2010. The friction-model – a dynamic model of functioning, disability and contextual factors and its conceptual and practical applicability, „Disability in Rehabilitation”, vol. 32, s. 1790–1797.

Brown M. 2010. Participation: the insider’s perspective, „Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation”, vol. 91, s. 34–37.

Carona C., Pereira M., Moreira H., Silva N., Canavarro M. C. 2013. The disability paradox revisited: Quality of life and family caregiving in pediatric celebral palsy, „Journal of Child and Family Studies”, vol. 22, s. 971–986.

Chun S., Lee Y. 2008. The experience of posttraumatic growth for people with spinal cord injury, „Quality Health Research”, vol. 18, s. 877–980.

Dibb B., Ellis-Hill C., Donovan-Hall M., Burridge J., Rushton D. 2013. Exploring positive adjustment in people with spinal cord injury, „Journal of Health Psychology”, vol. 19, s. 1043–1054.

Drum C.E., Horner-Johnson W., Krahn G.L. 2008. Self-rated health and healthy days: Examining the „disability paradox”, „Disability and Health Journal”, vol. 1, s. 71–78.

Drum C.E., Krahn G., Culley C., Hammond L. 2005. Recognizing and responding to the health disparities of people with disabilities, „Californian Journal of Health Promotion”, vol. 3, s. 29–42.

Dunn D.S. 1994. Positive meaning and illusions following disability. Reality negotiation, normative interpretation, and value change, „International of Social Behavior and Personality”, vol. 9, s. 123–138.

Dunn D.S. 2005. Negotiating realities to understand others: Teaching about meaning and well-being, „Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology”, vol. 24, s. 30–40.

Dunn D.S., Brody C. 2008. Defining the good life following acquired physical disability, „Rehabilitation Psychology”, vol. 53, s. 413–425.

Dunn D.S., Dougherty S.B., Elliott T.R. 2005. Prospects for a positive psychology of rehabilitation, „Rehabilitation Psychology”, vol. 50, s. 305–311.

Dunn D.S., Uswatte G., Elliott T.R. 2009. Happiness, resilience, and positive growth following physical disability: Issues for understanding, research and therapeutic intervention, [w:] Oxford handbook of positive psychology, ed. S.J. Lopez, C.R. Snyder, Oxford University Press, New York, s. 651–664.

Dziurowicz-Kozłowska A. 2002. Wokół pojęcia jakości życia, „Psychologia Jakości Życia”, nr 1, s. 77–99.

Fellinghauer B., Reinhardt J.D., Stucki G., Bickenbach J. 2012. Explaining the disability paradox: A cross–sectional analysis of the Swiss general population, „BMC Public Health”, vol. 12, s. 655–673.

Fuhrer M.J. 1994. Subjective well-being: Implications for medical rehabilitation outcomes and models of disablement, „American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation”, vol. 73, s. 358–364.

Gething L. 1985. Perceptions of disability of persons with cerebral palsy, their close relatives and able bodied persons, „Social Science and Medicine”, vol. 20, s. 561–565.

Helmes E. 2000. Function and disability or quality of life? Issues illustrated by the Osteoporosis Functional Disability Questionnaire, „Quality of Life Research”, vol. 9, s. 755–761.

Iezzoni L.I., McCarthy E.P., Davis R.B., Siebens H. 2000. Mobility problems and perceptions of disability by self-respondents and proxy respondents, „Medical Care”, vol. 38, s. 1051–1057.

Imrie R. 1997. Rethinking the relationships between disability, rehabilitation and society, „Disability and Rehabilitation”, vol. 19, s. 263–271.

Jette A.M. 2006. Toward a common language for function, disability, and health, „Physical Therapy”, vol. 86, s. 726–734.

Kahneman D., Krueger A.B., Schkade D.A., Schwarze N., Stone A.A. 2006. Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion, „Science”, vol. 30, s. 1908–1911.

Kirenko J. 2007. Indywidualna i społeczna percepcja niepełnosprawności, Wydawnictwo UMCS, Lublin.

Kosakowski C. 2003. Węzłowe problemy pedagogiki specjalnej, Wydawnictwo Akapit, Toruń.

Kowalik S. 2007. Psychologia rehabilitacji, Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, Warszawa.

Krahn G.L., Suzuki R., Horner-Johnson W. 2009. Self-rated health in persons with spinal cord injury: Relationship of secondary conditions, function and health status, „Quality of Life Research”, vol. 18, s. 575–584.

Krause J.S., Bozard J.L. 2012. Natural course of life changes after spinal cord injury: A 35-year longitudinal study, „Spinal Cord”, vol. 50, s. 227–231.

LoBianco A.F., Sheppard-Jones K. 2007. Perceptions of disability as related to medical and social factors, „Journal of Applied Social Psychology”, vol. 37, s. 1–13.

Marinic M., Brkljacic T. 2008. Love over gold – The correlation of happiness level with some life satisfaction factors between persons with and without physical disability, „Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities”, vol. 20, s. 527–540.

Mehnert T., Krauss H.H., Nadler R., Boyd M. 1990. Correlates of life satisfaction in those with disabling conditions, „Rehabilitation Psychology”, vol. 35, s. 3–17.

Migliorini C., Tonge B. 2009. Reflecting of subjective well-being and spinal cord injury, „Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine”, vol. 41, s. 445–450.

Nanda U., McLendon P., Andresen E., Armbrecht E. 2003. The SIP68: Abbreviated sickness impact profile for disability outcomes research, „Quality Life Research”, vol. 12, s. 593–595.

Olivier M. 1996. Understanding disability: From theory to practice, Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Powdthavee N. 2009. What happens to people before and after disability? Focusing effects, lead effects, and adaptation in different areas of life, „Social Science and Medicine”, vol. 69, s. 1834–1844.

Riis J., Lowenstein G., Baron J., Jepson C. 2005. Ignorance of hedonic adaptation: A study using ecological momentary assessment, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: General”, vol. 134, s. 3–9.

Salter J.E., Smith S.D., Ethans K.D. 2013. Positive and negative affect in individuals with spinal cord injuries, „Spinal Cord”, vol. 51, s. 252–256.

Schilling O. 2006. Development of life satisfaction in old age: Another view on the „paradox”, „Social Indicators Research”, vol. 75, s. 241–271.

Scullion P.A. 2010. Models of disability: their influence in nursing and potential role in challenging discrimination, „Journal of Advanced Nursing”, vol. 66, s. 697–707.

Sęk H. 1993. Jakość życia a zdrowie, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny”, nr 2, s. 110–117.

Sunderland N., Catalano T., Kendall E. 2009. Missing discourses: Concepts of joy and happiness in disability, „Disability and Society”, vol. 24, s. 703–714.

Tobiasz-Adamczyk B. 1999. Jakość życia – zakres badań w perspektywie socjologicznej, „Sztuka Leczenia”, nr 5, s. 9–13.

Ubel P.A., Loewenstein G., Schwarz N., Smith D. 2005. Misimagining the unimaginable: The disability paradox and health care decision making, „Health Psychology”, vol. 24, s. 57–62.

Uppal S. 2006. Impact of the timing, type and severity of disability on the subjective well-being of individuals with disability, „Social Science and Medicine”, vol. 63, s. 525–539.

Watson N. 2002. Well, I know this is going to sound very strange to you, but I don’t see myself as a disabled person: Identity and disability, „Disability and Society”, vol. 17, s. 509–527.

Wiliński M. 2010. Modele niepełnosprawności: indywidualny – funkcjonalny – społeczny, [w:] Diagnoza potrzeb i modele pomocy dla osób z ograniczeniami sprawności, red. A.I. Brzezińska, R. Kaczan, K. Smoczyńska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa, s. 15–59.

Wilson J.R., Hashimoto R.E., Dettori J.R., Fehlings M.G. 2011. Spinal cord injury and quality of life: A systematic review of outcome measures, „Evidence Based Spine Care Journal”, vol. 2, s. 37–44.

Woźniak Z. 2008. Niepełnosprawność i niepełnosprawni w polityce społecznej, Academica Wydawnictwo SWPS, Warszawa.

Zeidler W. 2007. Wzorzec czy model? Pojęcie normy w okresie transformacji, [w:] Niepełnosprawność– wybrane problemy psychologiczne i ortopedagogiczne, red. W. Zeidler, GWP, Gdańsk, s. 31–45.

Podobne publikacje