Dialogue-based school practices as a means of reducing conceptual fossilisation in language learning
2019, 64, Numer 1
Uniwersytet Gdański
Uniwersytet Gdański, Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Zakładz Badań nad Dzieciństwem i Szkołą
University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 64 KB
Liczba wyświetleń:179
Liczba pobrań:19
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
In language studies, fossilization is associated with the formation of permanent intermediate systems and subsystems. The interlanguage that develops between L1 and L2 (Selinker 1972) becomes embedded, rather than the learner continuing to develop increasing proficiency in the L2. As a language learner remains deficient in the target language (TL), it is important to attempt to mitigate this process and its negative effects. From this perspective, a task of the language teacher is to identify pedagogies which can prevent students from becoming lexically entrenched. In this paper, we advocate dialogic pedagogy as one which can reduce the likelihood of fossilisation occurring and which emphasises collaboration between learners, making their learning experiences meaningful. A core element of dialogic teaching and learning is the role of talk in the classroom in stimulating and advancing students’ learning and understanding. We propose that prioritising the oral component of language learning through dialogic pedagogy can reduce fossilisation because misconceptions do not remain unchallenged and become ingrained. A culture of dialogue in which the voices of all learners and teachers are heard and responded to is one in which learners’ exchanges contribute to extended understanding for all of those taking part in the dialogue.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Alexander R. 2008. Speaking but not listening? Accountable talk in an unaccountable context, “Literacy”, 44(3): 103–111.
Bakhtin M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Bakhtin M.M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, University of Texas Press, Austin and London.
Blum-Kulka S. & Levenston E.A. 1983. Universals of lexical simplification [in:] Strategies in Interlanguage Communication, C. Faerch, G. Kasper (eds.), Longman, London, pp. 119–139.
British Council. 2014. Languages for the future. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/ languages-for-the-future-report-v3.pdf [last accessed 20/07/2018).
European Commision. 2017. Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe. Eurydice Report. http://eurydice.indire.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Key-Data-on-Teaching-Languages-2017-Full-report_EN.pdf [Last accessed: 30/07/2018].
Doughty C. & Williams J. 1998. Pedagogical choices in focus on form, [in:] Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, C. Doughty, J. Williams (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 197–261.
Han Z. 2004. Fossilization: five central issues, “International Journal of Applied Linguistics”, Vol. 14, No. 2, 212–242.
Haneda M. & Wells G. 2008. L earning an additional language through dialogic inquiry, “Language and Education”, 22:2, 114–136.
Hennessy S. et al. 2016. Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts learning, “Culture and Social Interaction” 9, 16–44.
Hyltenstam K. 1988. Lexical characteristics of near-native second language learners of Swedish, “Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development”, No. 9, 67–84.
Kerslake L. 2018. From pragmatism to posthumanism: thinking through the Community of Philosophical Inquiry [in:] The theory of teaching thinking, Kerslake, L., Wegerif, R. (eds.), Routledge, London.
Kerslake L.& Rimmington S. 2017. Sharing talk, sharing cognition: philosophy with children as the basis for productive classroom interaction, “Issues in Early Education”, 1 (36), 21–32. Available online: http://www.pwe.ug.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/pwe-36.pdf [Last Accessed 09/08/18].
Li D. 2009. Activating strategies to fossilization for English learners in China, “English Language Teaching”, Vol. 2, No. 4, December 2009, 75–77.
Linell P. 2003. What is dialogism? http://cspeech.ucd.ie/Fred/docs/Linell.pdf [last accessed 10/08/2018]
Lipman M. 1998. Philosophy Goes To School. Temple, Philadelphia.
Long M. H. 1981. Input, interaction, second-language acquisition. [in:] Native language and foreign language acquisition, H. Winitz (Ed.), (pp.259–278). New York Academy of Sciences, New York.
Long M. H. 1983. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. “Applied Linguistics”, 4, 126–141.
Lowther M. 1983. Fossilization, pidginization and the Monitor, [in:] Language across cultures, L. Mac-Mathuna, D. Singleton (eds.), Irish Association for Applied Linguistics, Dublin, pp. 127–139.
Moate J. 2011. Reconceptualising the Role of Talk in CLIL, “Journal of Applied Language Studies”, Vol. 5 (2), 17–35.
Okońska-Walkowicz A. 1991. Przydatność wychowawczych kompetencji personalistycznych i liberalnych w wychowaniu dla demokracji, [in:] Wychowanie dla demokracji, A. Weyssenhoff (ed.), Krajów, 238–254.
Phillipson N., Wegerif R. 2017. Dialogic Education: Mastering core concepts through thinking together. Routledge, London and New York.
Pica T. 1994. Questions from the language classroom: Research perspectives, “TESOL Quarterly”, 28, 49–79.
Selinker L. 1972. Interlanguage, “IRAL” 10.2, 209–231.
Selinker L. 1974. Interlanguage, [in:] Error analysis, J.C. Richards, (ed.), Longman, London, pp. 31–54.
Selinker L. & Lamendella J.T. 1978. Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage fossilization: A discussion on ‘rule fossilization: A tentative model’, “Language learning”, No. 29, 363–375.
Śnieżyński M. 2001. Dialog edukacyjny, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej, Kraków.
Todorov T. 1984. Mikhail Bakhtin. The Dialogical Principle, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Wegerif R. 2007. Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning, Springer, New York.
Wegerif R. 2006. Dialogic education: What is it and why do we need it?, “Education Review” 19(2): 58–66.
Wei X. 2008. Implication of IL fossilization in second language acquisition, “English Language Teacher”, Vol. 1, No. 1, June 2008, 127–131.
Wysocka M. 2008. Stages of fossililisation in advanced learners and users of English: a longitudinal diagnostic study, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Lingwistycznej, Częstochowa.
Wells G. 1986. The Meaning Makers: Children Learning Language and Using Language to Learn, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
Spis treści/Contents
- personal knowledgetheory of learning – teachingschool educationtheory of teaching paradigm
Wiedza osobista uczniów jako punkt zwrotny w teorii i praktyce dydaktycznej
Dorota Klus-Stańska
- Pedagogy’s non-anthropocentric fundamentalseducational semiogenesis“symbolic effectiveness”“Imagined Other”
Uczyć się od... „wyimaginowanego Innego”
Alexander Połonnikow, Natalia Korczałowa