How do you solve a problem like MaRIA? Designing opportunities for Modelling and Reflecting on Instructional Activity within EU TAP-TS Learning & Teaching Packages and Learning Events
2024, 69, Numer 4
University College of Teacher Education in Vienna
Santarém Polytechnic University
Santarém Polytechnic University
University College Dublin
Santarém Polytechnic University
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 680 KB
Liczba wyświetleń:131
Liczba pobrań:28
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
The 'Teacher Academy Project on Teaching Sustainability' (TAP-TS) is one of eleven inaugural Erasmus+ Teacher Academies funded to address key educational concerns of the European Commission in developing the European Education Area (ERA). These academies foster European partnerships to enhance cooperation among teacher education institutions, curriculum experts, and training providers in order to support teachers and strengthen their continuous professional development across Europe. TAP-TS brings together a unique consortium of European teacher education partners focused on sustainability education, creating innovative teacher-education experiences using high-quality Learning and Teaching Packages (LTPs). Central to these LTPs is a model of professional learning that is “deeply reflective” and “values-led” (Cavadas et al., 2023; Goodwin et al., 2023; Menter & Flores, 2021; Purdy et al., 2023). This paper discusses how the partnership designed and integrated opportunities for systematic and reflective teacher learning into the TAP-TS instructional activities. The paper begins with an overview of TAP-TS and notes the importance of EU GreenComp (Bianchi, Pisiotis, & Cabrera, 2022) in its work. It then explores the TAP-TS Design Roadmap – detailing the project’s approach to planning reflective learning experiences through resources, materials, and pedagogies. Next, it describes the TAP-TS MaRIA framework, which guides follow-up learning activities within TAP-TS LTPs and project learning events – illustrating how this facilitates engagement levels and reflection in both technical and professional terms. The paper concludes by discussing teacher reflection as an act of professional agency – proposing that this generative reflection extends beyond the classroom and is essential for the deeper teacher learning and professionalism pursued by TAP-TS.
Bibliografia
Acoba, F., & Franco, R. (2019). Assessing sustainability: Everything matters. In Community College Handbook for Sustainability Education and Operations (pp. 30–42). National Council for Science and the Environment.
Bentvelzen, M., Woźniak, P. W., Herbes, P. S., Stefanidi, E., & Niess, J. (2022). Revisiting reflection in HCI: Four design resources for technologies that support reflection. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(1), 1–27.
Bertschy, F., Künzli, C., & Lehmann, M. (2013). Teachers’ competencies for the implementation of educational offers in the field of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 5, 5067–5080.
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera, M. (2022). GreenComp. The European Sustainability Competence Framework. Bacigalupo, M., Punie, Y. (Eds.), EUR 30955 EN. Luxmebourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://green-comp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/jrc128040_GreenComp_f2.pdf
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2015). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413.
Brudermann, T., Aschemann, R., Füllsack, M., Posch, A. (2019). Education for sustainable development 4.0: Lessons learned from the university of Graz, Austria. Sustainability, 11, 2347.
Bryan, A., Byrne, D., Coulter, M., Delahunty, T., Keane, E., Kitching, K., & Chróinín, D. N. (2024). ‘Bearing witness to negativity’: towards just futures of education. Irish Educational Studies, 43(3), 345–354.
Cavadas, B., Branco, N., Colaço, S., & Linhares, E. (2023). Teaching sustainability for primary school. Paper presented at ATEE Annual Conference 2023 “Teacher Education on the Move”. August 27–30, 2023, Budapest, Hungary.
Cormier, D., Jandrić, P., Childs, M., Hall, R., White, D., Phipps, L., Truelove, I., Hayes, S. & Fawns, T. (2019). Ten Years of the Postdigital in the 52group: Reflections and Developments 2009–2019. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 475–506.
Douglas, F., Beasy, K., Sollis, K., & Flies, E.J. (2024). Online, experiential sustainability education can improve students’ self-reported environmental attitudes, behaviours and wellbeing. Sustainability, 16, 2258.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65.
European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2024). Learning for sustainability in Europe: Building competences and supporting teachers and schools. Eurydice report. Luksembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/publications/learning-sustainability-europe-building-competences-and-supporting-teachers-and
Flores, M. A. (2023). Teaching and learning in teacher education: agency, reflection and identity. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(4), 557–560.
Galvin, C., Gehrmann, A., Madalińska-Michalak, J., Kost, J., Ananin, D., Farrell, R., Germer, P., Bárány, T., Fogarty, L. & Salihovic, M. (2023). Pushing crisis response towards sustainable transformation? Reflections from a case analysis of crisis-framed policy actions on teacher education in three European settings. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 803–820.
Galvin, C., Madalińska-Michalak, J., & Revyakina, E. (2024). The European Union Erasmus+ Teacher Academies Action: Complementing and supplementing European teacher education and teacher education research?. In V. Symeonidis (Ed.), Enhancing the Value of Teacher Education Research (pp. 170–197). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
Goodwin, A. L., Madalińska-Michalak, J., & Flores, M. A. (2023). Rethinking teacher education in/for challenging times: reconciling enduring tensions, imagining new possibilities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 840–855.
Gore, J., & Zeichner, K. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: a case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 119–136.
Gorski, P. C., & Dalton, K. (2020). Striving for critical reflection in multicultural and social justice tteacher education: Introducing a typology of reflection approaches. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(3), 357–368.
Guggemos, J., & Seufert, S. (2021). Teaching with and teaching about technology–Evidence for professional development of in-service teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106613.
Hauerwas, L. B., Gomez-Barreto, I. M., & Fernández, R. S. (2023). Transformative Innovation in teacher education: Research toward a critical global didactica. Teaching and Teacher Education, 123, 103974.
Jung, H., & Trischler, D. J. (2021, June). Exploring generative reflection by agency of visual practice: An autoethnographic study on reflection by noticing and making. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 549–563).
Korthagen, F. A. (2010). Teacher reflection: What it is and what it does. In E.G. Pultorak (Ed.), The purposes, practices, and professionalism of teacher reflectivity: Insights for twenty-first-century teachers and students (pp. 377–401). Lanham, ML: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lovren, V. O., Maruna, M., & Stanarevic, S. (2020). Reflections on the learning objectives for sustainable development in the higher education curricula – three cases from the University of Belgrade. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(2), 315–335.
Mazzucato, M. (2024). Collective value creation: a new approach to stakeholder value. International Review of Applied Economics, 38(1–2), 43–57.
Medina-García, M., Doña-Toledo, L., & Higueras-Rodríguez, L. (2020). Equal opportunities in an inclusive and sustainable education system: An explanatory model. Sustainability, 12, 4626.
Menter, I., & Flores, M. A. (2021). Teacher education, teacher professionalism and research: international trends, future directions. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 1–4.
Mylonas, G., Hofstaetter, J., Giannakos, M., Friedl, A., & Koulouris, P. (2023). Playful interventions for sustainability awareness in educational environments: A longitudinal, large-scale study in three countries. International Journal of Child–Computer Interaction, 35(100562), 1–17.
Olsson, D., Gericke, N., & Boeve-de Pauw, J. (2022). The effectiveness of education for sustainable development revisited. A longitudinal study on secondary students’ action competence for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 28(3), 405–429.
Purdy, N., Hall, K., Khanolainen, D., & Galvin, C. (2023). Reframing teacher education around inclusion, equity, and social justice: towards an authentically value-centred approach to teacher education in Europe. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 755–771.
Rauch, F., & Steiner, R. (2013). Competences for education for sustainable development in teacher education. CEPS Journal, 3, 9–24.
Rieckmann, M. (2018). Chapter 2 – Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in ESD. In A. Leicht, J. Heiss and W. J. Byun (Eds.), Issues and trends in education for sustainable development (pp. 39–59). Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002614/261445E.pdf
Rieckmann, M. (2022). Developing and assessing sustainability competences in the context of education for sustainable development. In: G. Karaarslan-Semiz (Ed.), Education for sustainable development in primary and secondary schools (pp. 191–203). Sustainable Development Goals Series. Cham: Springer.
Ruffinelli, A., Álvarez Valdés, C., & Salas Aguayo, M. (2022). Strategies to promote generative reflection in practicum tutorials in teacher training: the representations of tutors and practicum students. Reflective Practice, 23(1), 30–43.
Saari, M. H., Poulton-Busler, R., & Vladimirova, A. (2024). Does sustainability really start with teachers? Reflections on integrating environmental education in pre-service teacher education in Namibia and Finland. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1–15.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Sleurs, W. (2008). Competencies for ESD (Education for Sustainable Development) Teachers. A Framework to Integrate ESD in the Curriculum of Teacher Training Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/esd/inf.meeting.docs/EGonInd/8mtg/CSCT%20Handbook_Extract.pdf
Svendsen, B. (2020). Inquiries into teacher professional development–what matters?. Education, 140(3), 111–130.
Tasdemir, C., & Gazo, R. (2020). Integrating sustainability into higher education curriculum through a transdisciplinary perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265(121759), 1–14.
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C. & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54.
Villanen, H. (2014). Teachers’ reflections on an education for sustainable development project. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(2), 179–191.
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C.L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability, 6, 203–218.
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
Spis treści
- educationtheistic existentialismatheismproblematicspersonalismcontradictionvalues
Wychowanie w świetle filozofii egzystencjalnej
Agnieszka Rumianowska
- competitionfreedomliberal educationnoble goalsmastery and excellencecooperationcivilised rivalry
Pytanie o sens i pożytki ze współzawodnictwa w edukacji liberalnej
Katarzyna Wrońska
