Virtual Observations: A Situational Analysis of a Technological Response to Practicum Assessment During a Pandemic

2021, 66, No. 4


Publication date

14.06.2022

Publishing model

hybrid

Field

Social sciences

Discipline

education

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 1 MB

Article

Number of views:69

Number of downloads:7

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0


Abstract

In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, virtual observations were introduced to assess studentteachers, in a Scottish Initial Teacher Education (ITE) department. This research criticallyreflects on the usage of these virtual observations as they were deployed on a large scale tomeant the emergency requirements of teacher education during a pandemic. Using GroundedTheory as a qualitative frame (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016), this research employs Clarke’s (2005)situational analysis to provide insights into how effective virtual observations are in theassessment of teaching practicum. The research methods involved the collation of individual,written, critical reflections from 17 Practicum Tutors who used video to assess studentteacher competency. These pieces of reflective writing were then thematically analysed andthe resulting coding used to identify commonalities and trends. The importance of theskilled observer, the value of visual information, and the use of supplementary informationwere significant themes that emerged through the analysis. Overall, the effectiveness ofvirtual observations is confirmed, but caveats on its use remain. These caveats sit alongsidequestions of how virtual observation might be used in the future. Exploring the use of virtualobservations as an assessment tool, at scale, gives this paper a unique situation, and itsanalysis adds to the knowledge base for virtual observations and how they can be used withinteacher education.

Keywords:

Bibliography

Admiraal, W., Hoeksma, M., van de Kamp, M. T., & van Duin, G. (2011). Assessment of teacher competence using video portfolios: Reliability, construct validity, and consequential validity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1019-1028.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.002

Baecher, L., McCormack, B., & Kung, S. (2014). Supervisor use of video as a tool in teacher reflection. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language (TESL-EJ), 18(3), 1-17.

Bolton, M. (2010). Fly on the wall: Using teleconferencing to supervise student teacher performance. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 14(1), 62-76.

Birks, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2008). Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1744987107081254

Clarke, A. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553-576.

https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553

Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985833

Clarke, A., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. (2018). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the interpretive turn (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Dyke, M., Harding, A., & Liddon, S. (2008). How can online observation support the assessment and feedback, on classroom performance, to trainee teachers at a distance and in real time? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(1), 37-46.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701781432

Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York: New York University Press.

https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001

Glaser, B. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung (FQS), 5(2). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040245

General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS), (2012). The standards for registration: Mandatory requirements for registration with the General Teaching Council for Scotland. http://www.gtcs.org.uk/web/FILES/the-standards/standards-for-registration-1212.pdf

Graham, A., MacDougall, L., Robson, D., & Mtika, P. (2019). Exploring practicum: Student teachers' social capital relations in schools with high numbers of pupils living in poverty. Oxford Review of Education, 45(1), 119-135.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1502079

Hannafin, M. J., Shepherd, C. E., & Polly, D. (2010). Video assessment of classroom teaching practices: Lessons learned, problems and issues. Educational Technology, 50(1), 32-37. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429762

Johnston, D. H. (2020). School placement: Problematising notions of the 'good' placement. In R. Shanks (Ed.), Teacher preparation in Scotland (pp. 111-124). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83909-480-420201010

Kolb, S. (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1), 83-86.

Liang, J. (2015). Live video classroom observation: An effective approach to reducing reactivity in collecting observational information for teacher professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching: JET, 41(3), 235-253.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1045314

Mac Mahon, B., O'Grádaigh, S., & Ní Ghuidhir, S. (2019). Super vision: The role of remote observation in the professional learning of student teachers and novice placement tutors. TechTrends, 63, 703-710.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00432-z

Merriam, S. A., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mitchell, N., Marsh, B., Hobson, A. J., & Sorensen, P. (2010). 'Bringing theory to life': Findings from an evaluation of the use of interactive video within an initial teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 14(1), 15-27.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13664531003696543

Mtika, P. (2011). Trainee teachers' experiences of teaching practicum: Issues, challenges and new possibilities. Africa Education Review, 8(3), 551-567.

https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2011.618715

O'Grádaigh, S., Connolly, C., Mac Mahon, B., Agnew, A., & Poole, W. (2021). An investigation of emergency virtual observation (EVO) in initial teacher education in Australia and Ireland during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 303-310.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1916561

O'Leary, M. (2017). Reclaiming lesson observations: Supporting excellence in teacher learning. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621838

Scottish Parliament, (2017). Teacher workforce planning for Scotland's schools, 10th Report, Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament.

Shepherd, C., & Hannafin, M. (2011). Supporting Preservice Teacher Inquiry with Electronic Portfolios. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(2), 189-207.

Strübing, J. (2007). Research as pragmatic problem solving. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 580-601). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941.n27

Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671

Similar publications