“Where do we go?” – the dilemmas, challenges and hopes for future career development at the university
2016, 61, Numer 3
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu; Wydział Studiów Edukacyjnych
DOI
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 133 KB
Liczba wyświetleń:162
Liczba pobrań:18
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
Globalization and commercialization of higher education systems and social acceleration causes the changes in an academic career. Some policymakers and scholars perceive the neoliberal transformation and commercialization of higher education as a necessity and advantage, while the others, especially from the humanities and social sciences, recognize them as disruptions of a traditional university system. I would like to make an attempt to reconstruct the discussion of the Western scholars on neoliberal changes in academia. Moreover, I will point out the main dilemmas and controversies which occurred in the professional practice of scholars that include: the balance and disproportions between teaching and research; ‘publish or perish’ syndrome, specialization and fragmentation of knowledge and science; maintaining quality and dealing with bureaucracy in higher education system.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Arthur J. 2005. Student character in the British University, [in:] Citizenship education and highereducation, J. Arthur & K. E. Bohlin (eds.), Routledge, Oxon.
Backes-Gellner U. & Schlinghoff A. 2010. Career Incentives and “Publish or Perish” in German andU.S. Universities, European Education, vol. 42, No. 3.
Barnett R. 2000. Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity, Open University Press,Buckingham–Philadelphia.
Bazeley P. 2010. Conceptualising research performance, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 35, No. 8.
Brickhead T. 2007. Umbilical culture: standards and grade inflation, [in:] Can the prizes still glitter?The future of British universities in a changing world, H. de Burgh, A. Fazackerly, J. Black (eds.),The University of Buckingham Press, Buckingham.
Clegg P. 2008. Creativity and critical thinking in the globalised university, Innovations in Educationand Teaching International, vol. 45, No. 3.
Evans M. 2002. Did I sign up for this? Comments on the New Higher Education, [in:] TheMcDonaldization of higher education, D. Hayes & R. Wynyard (eds.), Bergin and Garvey,London.
Furedi F. 2002. The bureaucratization of British University, [in:] The McDonaldization of highereducation, D. Hayes & R. Wynyard (eds.), Bergin and Garvey, London.
Furedi F. 2002. Do academics still think? [in:] Can the prizes still glitter? The future of Britishuniversities in a changing world, H. de Burgh, A. Fazackerley, J. Black (eds.), The University ofBuckingham Press, Buckingham.
Gosling D. 2013. Quality enhancement in England, [in:] Enhancing quality in higher education. International perspectives, R. Land & G. Gordon (eds.), Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, NewYork–London.
Gregorian V. 2005. Six challenges to American University, [in:] Declining by degrees. Highereducation at risk, R. H. Hersh & J. Merrow (eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Harper R. 2013. “Being” post-death at zombie university, [in:] Zombies in the academy. Living deathin higher education, A. Whelan, R. Walker, C. Moore (eds.), Intellect, Bristol–Chicago.
Hayes D. & Wynyard R. 2002. Introduction, [in:] The McDonaldization of higher education, D. Hayes& R. Wynyard (eds.), Bergin and Garvey, London.
Hayes D. 2002. Taking the hemlock? The new sophistry of teacher training for higher education,[in:] The McDonaldization of higher education, D. Hayes & R. Wynyard (eds.), Bergin andGarvey, London.
Katula R. A. & Doody A. 1990. The collegiality model: an alternative for evaluating facultyproductivity, Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, October.
Kezim B., Pariseu S. E., Quinn E. 2005. Is Grade Inflation Related to Faculty Status?, Journal ofEducation for Business, July/August.
Kirp D. L. 2005. This little student went to market, [in:] Declining by degrees. Higher educationat risk, R. H. Hersh & J. Merro (eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Land R. & Gordon G. 2013. Enhancing the future. Context and fidelity, [in:] Enhancing qualityin higher education. International perspectives, R. Land & G. Gordon (eds.), Routledge Taylor& Francis Group, New York–London.
Lewis H. R. 2006. Excellence without soul. How a great university forgot education, Public Affairs,New York.
Mead L. M. 2010. The Other Danger... Scholasticism in Academic Research, Academic Questions,No. 23.
Mead L. M. 2011. Scholasticism: Causes and Cures, Academic Questions, No. 24.
Molesworth M., Nixon E., Scullion R. 2009. Having, being and higher education: the marketisationof the university and the transformation of the student into consumer, Teaching in HigherEducation, vol. 14, No. 3.
Parker M. 2002. Total Quality Control. Universities, Language, and Politics, [in:] The McDonaldizationof higher education, D. Hayes & R. Wynyard (eds.), Bergin and Garvey, London.
Potts M. 2005. The consumerist subversion of education, Academic Questions, Summer.
Randell-Moon H., Saltmarsh S., Sutherland-Smith W. 2013. The living dead and the dead living:contagion and complicity in contemporary university, [in:] Zombies in the academy. Livingdeath in higher education, A. Whelan, R. Walker, C. Moore (eds.), Intellect, Bristol–Chicago.
Readings B. 1997. University in Ruins, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ritzer G. 2002. Enchanting McUniversity: Toward a spectacularly irrational university quotidian,[in:] The McDonaldization of higher education, D. Hayes & R. Wynyard (eds.), Bergin andGarvey, London.
Rosa H. 2013. Social acceleration. A New theory of modernity, Columbia University Press, New York.
Santo S. A., Engstrom M. E., Reetz L., Schweinle W. E., Reed K. 2009. Faculty Productivity Barriersand Supports at a School of Education, Innovation in Higher Education, No. 34.
Singleton-Jackson J. A., Jackson D. L., Reinhardt J. 2010. Students as Consumers of Knowledge:Are They Buying What We’re Selling?, Innovative Higher Education, vol. 35, pp. 343–58.
Stack S. 2004. Gender, children and research productivity, Research in Higher Education, vol. 45,No. 8, December.
Waltoś S. 2012. Perypetie z karierą naukową w Polsce – kilka wstępnych refleksji na tle klasycznychmodeli tejże kariery, [in:] Kariera naukowa w Polsce. Warunki prawne, społeczne i ekonomiczne,S. Waltoś & A. Rozmus (eds.), Wydawnictwo Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa.
Whelan A. 2013. First as tragedy, then as corpse, [in:] Zombies in the academy. Living death in highereducation, A. Whelan, R. Walker, C. Moore (eds.), Intellect, Bristol–Chicago.
Wilken R., McCrea C. 2013. University life, zombie states and reanimation, [in:] Zombies in theacademy. Living death in higher education, A. Whelan, R. Walker, C. Moore (eds.), Intellect,Bristol–Chicago.
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
Podobne publikacje
20.03.2017
Hannah ArendtHenry A. Girouxneoliberalismpublic sphereuniversitycritical thinkingZbuntowana filozofia – subwersyjnej pedagogice. Hannah Arendt i Henry A. Giroux
Paulina Sosnowska
16.10.2017
Second Polish Republicdevelopment of pedagogyteacher educationuniversity„Studium wolne” a zagadnienie kształcenia nauczycieli szkół średnich na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim w okresie II Rzeczypospolitej
Kalina Bartnicka
11.11.2016
judgementknowledgeuniversityEuropean UnionJudgement calls in the university
Suzy Harris
