Reframing teacher empowerment: Between policy logics and professional autonomy
2026, 71, Numer 1
Krajowy Instytut Doskonalenia Nauczycieli i Personelu Szkolnego w Tokio
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Liczba wyświetleń:32
Liczba pobrań:0
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
This study develops a framework for analysing how policy logics shape teacher empowerment by integrating two orientations – having (resources and competencies) versus being (professional agency and identity) – and two loci, individual versus collective, into a Four-Quadrant Model. The model was applied to a systematic review of 49 peer-reviewed journal articles, with multi-stage coding by four researchers ensuring reliability. Results indicate a strong predominance of collective and having-oriented perspectives, signalling an emphasis on compliance, standardisation, and resource alignment. While some studies demonstrated reflective or transformative shifts across quadrants, these trajectories were comparatively limited. Overall, the review reveals a structural bias that privileges resource-based framings over sustained engagement with professional agency. The study contributes by offering the Four-Quadrant Model to clarify conceptual ambiguities in empowerment discourse and by proposing a Capability Realisation Heuristic that links resource provision with the protection of professional autonomy. These tools provide a transferable lens for informing policy design, professional development, and comparative inquiry beyond Japan.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Aelterman, A., Engels, N., Van Petegem, K., & Verhaeghe, J. (2007). The well-being of teachers in Flanders: The importance of a supportive school culture. Educational Studies, 33(3), 285–298.
Apple, M. W. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1–2), 11–29.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Biesta, G. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Boeskens, L., Nusche, D., & Yurita, M. (2020). Policies to support teachers’ continuing professional learning: A conceptual framework and mapping of OECD data. OECD Education Working Papers, 235.
Cave, P. (2016). Schooling selves: Autonomy, interdependence, and reform in Japanese junior high education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291−309.
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. London, England: Routledge.
Fromm, E. (1976/2013). To have or to be? London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
Fullan, M. (2021). The right drivers for whole system success. Victoria, Australia: Centre for Strategic Education.
Högberg, B., & Lindgren, J. (2021). Outcome-based accountability regimes in OECD countries: A global policy model? Comparative Education, 57(3), 301−321.
Ingersoll, R., & Collins, G. J. (2018). The status of teaching as a profession. In J. Ballantine, J. Spade, & J. Stuber (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp. 199–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980.
Mockler, N. (2020). Teacher professional learning under audit: Reconfiguring practice in an age of standards. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 166–180.
Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9 (2–3): 33–59.
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2025). Results from TALIS 2024: The state of teaching. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Priestley, M., & Drew, V. (2019). Professional enquiry: An ecological approach to developing teacher agency. In D. Godfrey, & C. Brown (Eds.), An ecosystem for research-engaged schools (pp. 154–169). London, England: Routledge.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. London, England: Bloomsbury.
Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149−161.
Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and teaching, 22(4), 413−425.
Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Leadership for equity and adequacy in education. School Leadership & Management, 41(4–5), 447−469.
Schleicher, A. (2018). The world class: How to build a 21st-century school system. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schleicher, A. (2020). Developing twenty-first-century skills for future jobs and societies. In B. Panth, and R. Maclean (Eds.), Anticipating and preparing for emerging skills and jobs (pp. 47–55). Singapore: Springer.
Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
Simola, H. (2014). The Finnish education mystery: Historical and sociological essays on schooling in Finland. London England: Routledge.
Solomon, B. (1976). Black empowerment: Social work in oppressed communities. New York, NY: Colombia University Press.
UNESCO. (2016). Global education monitoring report 2016 – Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
23.06.2026
educating teachersprofessional autonomy of teacherseducational theory researchsocial emotional learningdigital technologies in teachingContents
23.06.2026
Nowośćeducating teachersprofessional autonomy of teacherseducational theory researchsocial emotional learningdigital technologies in teachingIntroduction
Joanna Madalińska-Michalak, Zuzanna Zbróg, Agnieszka Szplit
24.06.2026
Nowośćprofessional autonomyteacherdevelopment of professional autonomyreflectionexploratory case studyDevelopment of professional autonomy of secondary school teachers in the Czech Republic
Jaroslava Ševčíková, Jitka Plischke, Jitka Nábělková, Iva Koribská
Podobne publikacje
18.02.2021
pedagogymotivationstudentexpectationsteacher educationteaching professionŚwiadomy vs. przypadkowy wybór kierunku studiów pedagogicznych – analiza porównawcza
Beata Mydłowska
26.06.2026
Nowośćdigital competencehigher educationteacher educationdigital transformationteacher educatorDigital technologies in teaching: insights from Vietnamese teacher educators through a European perspective
Joanna Madalińska-Michalak, Lan Nhi Truong Thi, Nguyen Tien Hoang
01.08.2024
European educationteacher educationtransnational mobilityvirtual mobilityExploring the role of mobility in fostering the internationalization of teacher education – with a special focus on Europeanness
Daniela Worek
