Learning in the digitally transforming world – challenges and chances
2016, 61, Numer 3
Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Lingwistyki Stosowanej, Instytut Komunikacji Specjalistycznej i Interkulturowej
DOI
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 161 KB
Liczba wyświetleń:100
Liczba pobrań:15
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
The contemporary university – as any other educational, social, business, or government institution – functions in condition of what David Harvey has called time-space compression: everything is happening here without distances, differences or frontiers; and everything is happening now without past or future. The very structure of the knowledge has changed: it has become complex, interdisciplinary, rather problem-based than discipline-based. Purely intellectual knowledge is no longer relevant; its true value is determined by its potential for commercial application. Besides, with constant advent of new technologies, both knowledge and skills turn obsolete in no time. Thus, the university must equip learners with tools, strategies and resources which would allow them to independently upgrade their knowledge and skills whenever demanded throughout their after-university professional or academic careers. In the present article, I outline new literacies essential for a learner to study in a technology-enhanced global classroom, and review the potential of the new technology for education. I then consider constructing Personal Learning Environments (PLEs) as a means to individualize and support learning in different contexts. Having gained attention of educators since 2004, PLE represents an evolving trend in sustainable education due to its potential to let learners create their own educational spaces in order to direct their own learning, to pursue individual educational goals, and to expand learning far beyond the classroom.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Abhary K., Adriansen H. K., Begovac F., Djukic D., Qin B., Spuzic S., Wood D., Xing K. 2009. Somebasic aspects of knowledge, [in:] Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1,pp. 1753–8.
Attwell G. 2007. Personal Learning Environments – the future of eLearning?, eLearning Papers,Vol. 2, No. 1, ISSN: 1887-1542, pp. 1–8, available online at: www.elearningpapers.eu(accessed March 2014).
Britt A.M. & Gabrys G.L. 2001. Teaching advanced literacy skills for the World Wide Web, [in:]C.R. Wolfe (ed.), Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web, American Press, San Diego.
Buchem I., Attwell G. & Torres R. 2011. Understanding Personal Learning Environments:Literature review and synthesis through the Activity Theory lens, [in:] Proceedings of the PLEConference 2011, Southampton, UK, pp. 1–33.
Buchem I. & Perez-Sanagustin M. 2013. Personal Learning Environments in Smart Cities: currentapproaches and future scenarios, eLearning Papers, special issue No. 35, November, ISSN:1887-1542, pp. 1–14, available online at: www.elearningpapers.eu (accessed March 2014).
Butcher N. 2011. A Basic Guide to Open Educational Resources (OER), Commonwealth of Learning:Vancouver, Canada & UNESCO: Paris, France.
Cooperstein S.E. & Kocevar-Weidinger E. 2004. Beyond active learning: a constructivist approachto learning, Emerald Insight, Vol. 32, No. 2, Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK,pp. 141–8.
Couros A. 2010. Developing Personal Learning Networks for Open and Social Learning, [in:]G. Veletsianos (ed.), Emerging Technologies in Distance Education, AU Press, AntabascaUniversity, Canada, pp. 109–28.
Downes S. 2009. New tools for personal learning, talk at MEFANET 2009 Conference, Brno, CzechRepublic, available online at: www.downes.ca/presentation/234 (accessed March 2014).
Drexler W. 2010. The networked student model for construction of personal learningenvironments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy, Australasian Journal ofEducational Technology, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 369–85.
Duderstadt J.J., Wulf W.M. & Zemsky R. 2005. Envisioning a Transformed University, Issues inScience and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 35–41. Washington: National Academy Press.
EDUCAUSE 2009: 7 things you should know about... Personal Learning Environments, available onlineat: EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, www.educause.edu/eli (accessed March 2014).
EDUCAUSE 2007: 7 things you should know about... RSS, available online at: EDUCAUSE LearningInitiative, www.educause.edu/eli (accessed March 2014).
Fischer G. 1999. Lifelong Learning: Changing Mindsets, [in:] G. Veletsianos, T. Okamoto, L. Gomez(eds.), 7th International Conference on Computers in Education “New Human Abilities for theNetworked Society”, (ICCE’99, Chiba, Japan), IOS Press: Omaha 1999.
Goodyear P. 2005. Educational design and networked learning: patterns, pattern languages anddesign practice, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 82–101.
Harvey D. 1992. The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change,Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA USA & Oxford UK.
Johnson L., Levine A. & Smith R. 2009. The 2009 Horizon Report, The New Media Consortium,Austin, Texas.
Kesim M. & Altmpulluk H. 2013. The future of LMS and Personal Learning Environments, ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, special issue CY-ICER 2013, Elsevier Ltd, available online at:www.sciencedirect.com (accessed March 2014).
OpenCourseWare Consortium, www.ocwconsortium.org (accessed March 2014).
Reinhart C.J. 2008. Constructing the cafe university: teaching and learning on the digital frontier,On the horizon, Vol. 16, No. 1, ISSN 1074-8121, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley,UK, pp. 13–33.
Resnick M. 2002. Rethinking learning in the Digital Age, [in:] G. Kirkman (ed.), The GlobalInformation Technology Report: Readiness for the Networked World, Oxford University Press,Oxford, UK, pp. 32–7.
Rosen S. 1975. Measuring the obsolescence of knowledge, [in:] J. Thomas (ed.), Education, Income,and Human Behavior, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., pp. 199–232.
Schmoker M. 2007. Reading, writing, and thinking for all, Educational Leadership, Vol. 64, No. 7,pp. 63–6.
Shin U. 1986. The structure of interdisciplinary knowledge: a Polanyian view, Issues in IntegrativeStudies, No. 4, pp. 93–104.
Siemens G. 2005. Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age, International Journal ofInstructional Technology and Distance Learning, Vol. 2, No. 1, ISSN 1550-6908, available onlineat: www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/index.htm (accessed March 2014).
Wolfe C.R. 2001. Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web, [in:] C.R. Wolfe (ed.), Learningand Teaching on the World Wide Web, American Press, San Diego.
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
Podobne publikacje
19.05.2025
weblogprofessional developmentteachersmedia competenceslifelong learningThe usefulness of a weblog as a tool for teachers’ professional development
Maha Rajeh Aljarad
11.11.2016
HumboldtDiltheyWeberBildungcreativity of actionunderstandinglifeworldlifelong learningPytanie o aktualność Humboldtowskiej idei uniwersytetu z perspektywy współczesnych zadań humanistyki
Wojciech Hanuszkiewicz
18.01.2016
national extramural examslifelong learningvalidation of non-formal and informal learningself-directed learningModel eksternistyczny jako przykład uczenia się przez całe życie
Zofia Lisiecka
