„To learn with” in the view of the holistic, relational and inclusive education
2019, 64, No. 1
Uniwersytet Gdański, Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Zakład Badań nad Dzieciństwem i Szkołą
Froebel Department of Primary and Early Childhood Education, Maynooth University
Marino Institute of Education Dublin
University of Porto, Education Sciences Department, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences of the University of Porto
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 64 KB
Number of views:310
Number of downloads:55
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The text is an attempt at illustrating the category “to learn with…” in three approaches: holistic, inclusive and relational. Each of them brings in interesting solutions to work with children which originate in a constructivist-humanistic approach to education. The text points out the value of communication and building relationships between a teacher and a child; the sense of play and active learning by using a problem-solving approach, motivation and children’s interest in the world.
Bibliography
Bae B. 2009. Children’s right to participate – challenges in everyday interactions, “European Early Childhood Education Research Journal”, 17(3), pp. 391–406.
Bernstein B. 1961. Social Class and Linguistic Development: A Theory of Social Learning, [ in:] A. H. Halsey, J. Floud & C. A. Anderson (Eds.), Education, Economy and Society (pp. 288–314), Free Press, New York.
Bronfenbrenner U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bronfenbrenner U. & Morris P.A. 2006. The Bioecological Model of Human Development [in:] Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol 1, Theoretical Models of Human Development, R. M. Lerner & W. E. Damon (Eds.), (pp. 793–828). John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex.
Brougère G. 1998. A criança e a cultura lúdica, “Revista Faculdade Educação”, 24(2), pp.103–116.
Dahlberg G. & Moss P. 2005. Ethics and Politics in Early Childhood Education (Contesting Early Childhood), Routledge, London.
Ferreira M. & Tomás C. 2017. A educação de infância em tempos de transição paradigmática: uma viagem por discursos políticos e práticas pedagógicas em Portugal, “Cadernos de Educação de Infância”, 112, Set/Dez., pp. 19–33.
Filipiak E. 2008. Uczenie się w klasie szkolnej w perspektywie socjokulturowej, [in:] Rozwijanie zdolności uczenia się. Wybrane konteksty i problemy, Wyd. UKW, Bydgoszcz, p. 30.
Hayes N. & Filipović K. 2018. Nurturing ‘buds of development’: from outcomes to opportunities in early childhood practice, “International Journal of Early Years Education”, 26(3), pp. 220–232.
Hayes N., O’Toole L. & Halpenny A. 2017. Introducing Bronfenbrenner: A guide for practitioners and students in early years education, Routledge, London.
Hederman M-P. 2012. The boy in the bubble: education as personal relationship, Veritas, Dublin, Ireland.
James A. & Prout A. (Eds.) 1990. Constructing and reconstructing childhood. Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood, Falmer Press, London.
Kjørholt A-T. & Qvortrup J. (Eds.) 2012. The Modern Child and the Flexible Labour Market. Early Childhood Education and Care, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Kochanowska E. 2018. Uczenie się we współpracy w klasie – (nie)możliwe obszary działań nauczycieli edukacji wczesnoszkolnej, [in:] Horyzonty dziecięcych znaczeń, red. M. Wiśniewska-Kin, J. Bonar, A. Buła, Wyd. UŁ, Łódź.
Kola A. F. & Kola A.M. 2015. Polish education in transition: paralel models, “International Journal of Social Economics”, 42(9), pp. 852–867.
Lansdown G. 2010. The realisation of children’s participation rights [in:] A Handbook of children and young people’s participation, perspectives from theory and practice, Barry Percy-Smith & Nigel Thomas (Eds.), (pp. 11–23), Routledge, London.
Moss P. & Petrie P. 2002. From Children’s Services to Children’s Spaces: public policy, children and childhood, RoutledgeFalmer, London.
National Research Council. 2012. From neurons to neighborhoods: An update: Workshop summary, National Academies Press, Washington.
Ryle A. & Kerr I.B. 2002. Introducing cognitive analytic therapy: Principles and practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Santos B.S. 1991. A transição paradigmática: da regulação a emancipação, “Oficina do CES”, 25, pp. 1–36.
Thomas N. & Percy-Smith B. 2010. Introduction, [in:] A Handbook of children and young people’s participation, perspetives from theory and practice, Barry Percy-Smith & Nigel Thomas (Eds.), (pp. 1–8), Routledge, London.
Trevarthen C. 2017. The affectionate, intersubjective intelligence of the infant and its innate motives for relational mental health, “International Journal of Cognitive Analytic Therapy and Relational Mental Health”, Vol. 1, pp. 11–53.
Wong S. & Turner K. 2014. Constructions of social inclusion within Australian early childhood education and care policy documents, “Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Education”, 15(1), pp. 54–68.
Other articles from the issue
Spis treści/Contents
- personal knowledgetheory of learning – teachingschool educationtheory of teaching paradigm
Wiedza osobista uczniów jako punkt zwrotny w teorii i praktyce dydaktycznej
Dorota Klus-Stańska
- Pedagogy’s non-anthropocentric fundamentalseducational semiogenesis“symbolic effectiveness”“Imagined Other”
Uczyć się od... „wyimaginowanego Innego”
Alexander Połonnikow, Natalia Korczałowa
Similar publications
14.05.2023
democracyself-governanceparticipationschooleducationKorczakanti-authoritarian pedagogyOd idei korczakowskiej samorządności do niemożności jej spełnienia w publicznym szkolnictwie
Bogusław Śliwerski
25.10.2019
healthchronic diseaseseducationschool activitiesextracurricular activitiesUczestnictwo w zajęciach lekcyjnych i pozalekcyjnych w zależności od stanu zdrowia uczniów oraz wybranych czynników kontekstowych
Anna Kowalewska, Aleksandra Berkowska, Joanna Mazur
18.12.2025
LECH WITKOWSKI UNDERFOOT, OR REFLECTIONS ON AUTHORITY, TRADITION, AND FLYING
Jan Rutkowski
